The voting intention gender gap

November 15th, 2006

The Times’s report of this month’s Populus poll highlighted what appeared to be a striking 7 point difference in the Conservative lead between how men would vote and how women would vote, a gap that grew to 12 points when Populus asked how people would vote with Brown as leader. There various bits of commentary on how David Cameron is winning the women’s vote. But is he?

I warned at the time that the big twelve point difference on the hypothetical question with Brown as leader might well be based on very small sample sizes - indeed it was. In fact, if you look at the gender breaks in Populus’s polls there is no obvious pattern, it bounces up and down from month to month. Back in April the Conservative lead amognst women was also 6 points higher than amongst men, but come July the Tory lead was 8 points higher amongst men.

ICM’s gender splits don’t show a steady pattern either - in their October poll male and female voting intention was almost identical, but in their two previous polls the Conservative lead was far, far larger amongst men than women. In their last poll for the Sunday Telegraph the Conservatives had a 15 point lead amongst men and a 2 point lead amongst women. In their September poll for the Guardian though, the Conservative lead was 10 points higher amongst women.

Therefore it looks as though the apparantly gender gap in the polls wasn’t significant at all, it’s just the result of the small sample sizes you get on crossbreaks throwing up erratic figures. The exception, however, is YouGov. YouGov have larger sample sizes to start with, and don’t filter or weight by likelihood to vote, leaving them with a larger sample and - in theory at least - less volatile cross breaks. Looking at the Conservative lead amongst men and amongst women on YouGov’s polls since the last election there is a noticeable pattern.

On YouGov’s crossbreaks the Conservatives have recorded a higher lead amongst women voters than amongst men in all but one poll since September 2005 (the exception had identical leads amongst men and women). On average the Conservative lead amongst women has been six points larger than amongst men. In comparison, prior to September 2005 YouGov recorded leads amongst women that were almost identical to those amongst men (if anything, the Conservatives did marginally better amongst men). It does tie up exactly with David Cameron’s emergence as the frontrunner in the Conservative leadership campaign, but certainly judging by YouGov’s figures the Tories have opened up an advantage amongst women since last Autumn.

graph

The bottom line, therefore, is that the gender gap in one single Populus poll probably doesn’t signify much at all - but looking at the longer term picture women voters do seem to have swung more heavily to the Conservatives than male voters have.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • NewsVine
  • Facebook

7 Responses

Peter cairns

I am not sure if we are talking about a Cameron factor so much as the Cameron agenda. The Tories have been pushing green issues hard since Cameron took over and I seem to recall that when Yougov polls on “Which issue most concerns you”, women tend to put the enviroment higher than men.

I would be interesting to see the same graph (25/11/04 to 25/09/06) with the gender split on the enviroment, or nuclear power, which Blair has backed and Cameron has shifted tory policy on.

Peter.

Fred

What periods are the ‘average’ lines calculated over? 3 months?

Anthony Wells

Fred - roughly, it’s the three last polls, so it will be three months unless there were extra polls for the Sunday Times or during the election campaign.

Fred

Thanks Anthony, I thought so from the shape of the lines.

Our take on this here:

http://thedaily.wordpress.com/2006/11/14/the-gender-gap/

We’ve not conducted as thorough an analysis as you but it did seem from the ICM/Populus figures that you had to distinguish between the Tory lead and the Tory vote share.

The Tory lead, as often as not, was caused not by Cameron getting a higher share of the vote amongst women than men, but by Labour getting a lower share, with the difference going mainly to “Don’t Know” and to a lesser extent the Lib Dems and Greens.

So, the Tory lead looks higher among women but that doesn’t necessarily indicate a surge in female support for Cameron’s Tories so much as a dip in female support for Labour.

However, it may be that you’re able to do a full analysis that counters our less scientific observations. Did you get an impression either way on that, Anthony?

Peter - women are certainly more concerned about the environment, more likely to support environmentalist policies, and more likely to think that Cameron is genuine on the issue, than men. But their top priorities are still immigration, crime, health and defence/terrorism so it’s as likely to be differing opinions on those that causes any gender gap.

Mark Senior

There has certainly been a bigger lead amongst women as shown by yout graph since he became leader but it is interesting that as Labour caught up in the polls at conference time it virtually disappeared and though the gap has widened again it is not as great now as it was in June/July .

Jack

In case anyone is interested in the Victoria Australia election due on Saturday -
http://www.pollbludger.com/category/victorian-election-2006/
is a good site for discussion of polling.

Leave a Comment

UKPollingReport is a non-partisan site, intended as an area for neutral non-partisan discussion between people of different political alligiences or none. It is not intended for political debate. Comments outside this spirit may be moderated. For the full comments policy please go here.